S.No./
W.P.No. |
Petitioners/Respondents |
Relief sought / Relief Granted |
Filing/
Disposal/
Follow -up |
1
5515/87
M.P.No. 7398/87 |
Bh.Darmaraju and others
Vs
Managing Director Godavari plywood Ltd. |
Relief Granted: " Managing Director Godavari plywoods ltd. Rampachodavaram E.G.Dt. be and hereby is directed not to cut any mango trees, jamum and jack trees and cutting the forests of Maredumilli mandal, E.G.Dt" |
Disposed On : 13-Jun-1996 |
2
6175/87
M.P.No.8273/87 |
P.Siva RamaKrishna & others Vs M.D Godavari plywood Ltd. |
Relief Sought : Not to cut any mango,jamum and jack trees in the forest of Gudem mandal Visakhapatnam Dt. |
Disposed On : 07-Nov-1994 |
3
9660/92 |
SAKTI
V/s
State of A.P. |
Relief Granted: " Directed the respondents 2 & 4 to take necessary action under the provisions of the forest act in general and section 28 E and 44 of the Act in particular against he 5 th respondent for cutting trees in land in S.No.51/1 to 51/5 of Chintalapudi village of Y.Ramavaram mandal." |
Disposed On : 29-Dec-1994 |
4
4882/95
M.P.No. 26702/96 |
Sakti Vs Govt & GPL |
Relief sought: To suspend the operation of G.O M.S No.66.environment, forest ,science and technology dept. dt 24-4-96
Relief Granted: "The learned counsel for the petitioner submit that as per the provisions of the forest conservation act sanction of the Central Government is mandatory for felling trees.
Direction to the Dt forest officer kakinada (R4) to approach the competent authorities for the grant of necessary permission for the supply of the raw material." |
|
5
8926/91 |
Sakti
Vs
• State of A.P rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt. Energy, Forests, Environment,Science&Technology(Forests-III)Dept. Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
• The Principal Conservator of Forests, Andhra Pradesh, opposite R.B.I Office, Hydertabad.
• 3. The Director of Tribal Welfare, Telugu Sankshema Bhavan, Hyderabad . |
Relief sought: to issue a writ or order particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring Memo No. 7935/For.III/90-12 dated 25.6.91 issued by the 1 st respondent as illegal and void and consequently direct the respondents to renew the lease of sundra trees in favour of tribals in Karimnagar and Khammam districts also on par with Adilabad and Warangal Districts. |
|
6
8108/92
W.A. No 1394/92
In 8108/92 |
M/S. Andhra Forest Industries, Warangal reo. By its Managing Partner, V.B.Yadav.
Vs
• State of Andhra Pradesh , rep. by secretary to govt. forest Dept. Secretariat, Hydetabad
• Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Hyd.
• Sakthi .
***
SAKTI
Vs
1.State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Secretary to Govt.,Forest Dept
2.Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,
3.M/s. Andhra Forest Industries, Warangal
|
Relief Sought : to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction;(1) declaring the action of the respondents in not allotting the raw matedrial(sundra trees) to the petitioner as violative of Article 14, 19(I) (g) and 300-A of the constitution of India;(ii) declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing the orders on the decision taken at the meeting held on 27-11-1990 chaired by the Hon'ble Minister for Forests as arbitrary, illegal and direct the respondents to issue orders according to the decision taken at the meeting held on 27-11-1990 by the Hon'ble Minister for Forests; ( iii) a direction may be given to the respondents to renew the lease to the petitioner by allotting sundra trees; (iv) costs be awarded to the petitioner.
Relief Granted: "We find that no real exception can be taken to the direction of the learned single Judge by which Respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider grant of lease Sundra Trees to the original writ petitioner from Khammam and Karimnagar in accordance with G.O. Ms.25, dt 12-2-92,entitles the original writ petitioner to such grant then only such grant of lease has to be given. In short, all these aspects are left for consideration to the appropriate authority in the light of the G.O concerned". |
|
07.
3530/95 |
M.Narasimha Murthy
Vs
Dist.Collector E.G. |
|
Disposed On : 25-Nov-1999 |
